Instrucción entre Pares como estrategia de aprendizaje activo en odontología

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30979/BrazJDentEduc.v25.2435

Palabras clave:

Educación en Odontología, Métodos de Enseñanza, Estudiantes de Odontología

Resumen

The Peer Instruction methodology was proposed to transform the pedagogical practices of Harvard’s physics program. Even though it was developed in 1991, this method has not been very reported in literature focusing on health science. So, this study aims to report and discuss the perception of dentistry students and professors from the University (blinded for peer review), that has been using the Peer Instruction methodology. The strategy consists of small debated exhibitions followed by a question. The students must answer the multiple-choice question individually. After, they have to convince their classmates why their answer is the right one, presenting arguments and debating them. After Peer Instruction, there is a poll. When less than 30% of students answered correctly, the topic was explained again. Between 30 and 70%, the topic was debated again, with the group. When more than 70% of students answered correctly, the topic was closed. From the students’ reports, it was possible to see that the Peer Instruction methodology can be used as an active teaching and learning tool in dentistry programs. The method seems to favor mainly attention, debate, and understanding of concepts. However, the ability to solve problems seems to be less facilitated with the methodology. Peer Instruction can be an interesting strategy for professors who seek to transform their expository classes into active approaches.

Biografía del autor/a

Luisa Quevedo Grave, Universidade Federal de Pelotas

Universidade Federal de Pelotas (UFPel), Pelotas, RS, Brasil.

Luana Carla Salvi, Universidade Federal de Pelotas

Universidade Federal de Pelotas (UFPel), Pelotas, RS, Brasil.

Francine dos Santos Costa, Universidade Federal de Pelotas

Universidade Federal de Pelotas (UFPel), Pelotas, RS, Brasil.

Magali Teresinha Quevedo Grave, Universidade do Vale do Taquari

Universidade do Vale do Taquari (UNIVATES), Lajeado, RS, Brasil.

Luiz Alexandre Chisini, Universidade Federal de Pelotas / Radboud University Medical Center

Universidade Federal de Pelotas (UFPel), Pelotas, RS, Brasil. Radboud University Medical Center (Rabdoudumc), Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Citas

Noro LLRA, Farias-Santos BCS, Sette-de-Souza PH, Cruz RKS, Pinheiro IAG, Borges REA, et al. O professor (ainda) no centro do processo ensino-aprendizagem em Odontologia. Rev ABENO [Internet]. 2015;15(1):2-11. doi: https://doi.org/10.30979/rev.abeno.v15i1.146

Melo NB, Fernandes Neto J, Catão MHCV, Bento PM. Metodologia da Problematização e Aprendizagem Baseada em Problemas na Odontologia: análise bibliométrica dos trabalhos apresentados nas Reuniões da SBPqO. Rev ABENO [Internet]. 2017;17(2):60-7. doi: https://doi.org/10.30979/rev.abeno.v17i2.413

Paula LM, Bezerra ACB. A estrutura curricular dos cursos de Odontologia no Brasil. Rev ABENO [Internet]. 2003 [cited 2025 Jun 09];3(1):7-14. doi: https://doi.org/10.30979/rev.abeno.v3i2.1458

San Martin AS, Chisini LLA, Martelli S, Sartori LRM, Ramos EC, Demarco FF. Distribuição dos cursos de Odontologia e de cirurgiões-dentistas no Brasil: uma visão do mercado de trabalho. Rev ABENO [Internet]. 2018;18(1):63-73. doi: https://doi.org/10.30979/rev.abeno.v18i1.399

Brasil. Conselho Nacional de Educação. Câmara de Educação superior. Resolução CNE/CES Nº 3, de 19 de fevereiro de 2002. Institui Diretrizes Curriculares Nacionais do Curso de Graduação em Odontologia. 2022 [cited 2025 Jun 09]. Available from: http://portal.mec.gov.br/cne/arquivos/pdf/CES032002.pdf. 2002

Brasil. Conselho Nacional de Educação. Câmara de Educação superior. Resolução CNE/CES Nº 3, de 21 de junho de 2021. Institui Diretrizes Curriculares Nacionais do Curso de Graduação em Odontologia e dá outras providências. Brasil: CNE/CES. 2021 [cited 2025 Jun 09]. Available from: http://portal.mec.gov.br/docman/junho-2021-pdf/191741-rces003-21/file 2021

Ribeiro-Silva ER, Amorim C, Aparicio-Herguedas JL, Batista P. Trends of active learning in higher education and students' well-being: a literature review. Front Psychol [Internet]. 2022;13:844236. Availabre from: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.844236/full

Jeong JS, Gonzalez-Gomez D. Editorial: cognitive, affective, behavioral, and multidimensional domain research in stem education: active approaches and methods towards Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Front Psychol [Internet]. 2022;13:881153. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.881153

Vieira MNCM, Pinto-Panúncio MP. A Metodologia da Problematização (MP) como estratégia de integração ensino-serviço em cursos de graduação na área da saúde. Medicina [Internet]. 2015;48(3):241-8 [cited 2025 Jun 09]. Available from: https://revistas.usp.br/rmrp/article/view/104310

Mazur E. Peer Instruction: a revolução da aprendizagem ativa. Porto Alegre: Penso; 2015.

Fujita JALDM, Mecena EH, Carmona EV, Shimo AKK. Uso da metodologia da problematização com o Arco de Maguerez no ensino sobre brinquedo terapêutico. Rev Port de Educação [Internet]. 2016;29(1):229-58. doi: https://doi.org/10.21814/rpe.5966

Reul MA, Lima ED, Irineu KN, Lucas R, Costa EMMB, Madruga RCR. Metodologias ativas de ensino aprendizagem na graduação em Odontologia e a contribuição da monitoria - relato de experiência. Rev ABENO [Internet]. 2016;16(2):62-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.30979/rev.abeno.v16i2.241

Guedert DG, Lima P, Souza ESR, Carmona VCCG. The use of active methodologies for the teaching of human embryology: A systematic review. Anat Histol Embryol [Internet]. 2022;51(3):332-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/ahe.12803

Crouch C, Mazur E. Peer instruction: ten years of experience and results. Am J Phys [Internet]. 2001;69(9):970-77. Available from: https://web.mit.edu/jbelcher/www/TEALref/Crouch_Mazur.pdf

Vickrey T, Rosploch K, Rahmanian R, Pilarz M, Stains M. Research-Based Implementation of Peer Instruction: a literature review. CBE Life Sci Educ [Internet]. 2015;69(9):14:1-11. doi: https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1374249

Crossgrove K, Curran KL. Using clickers in nonmajors- and majors-level biology courses: student opinion, learning, and longterm retention of course material. CBE Life Sci Educ [Internet]. 2008;7(1):146-54. doi: https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.07-08-0060

Mitsuhashi T. The Effect of Peer Instruction Lectures on Learning Attitudes in Epidemiology Education. Acta Med Okayama [Internet]. 2021;75(5):601-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.18926/AMO/62773

Mohammad M, Viuff SL, Munch MW, Berg RMG. Peer instruction versus conventional group work-based teaching in a laboratory exercise on respiratory physiology: a randomized study. Adv Physiol Educ [Internet]. 2021;45(4):694-70. doi: https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00045.2021

Ruggeri B, Vega ABS, Liveris ML, Thomas EST, George ST, Hopp J. A strategy for teaching health literacy to physician assistant students. Health Lit Res Pract [Internet]. 2021;5(1):e70-e7. doi: https://doi.org/10.3928/24748307-20210201-01

Straw AM, Wicker E, Harper NG. Effect of peer instruction pedagogy on concept mastery in a first professional year pharmacy self-care course. Curr Pharm Teach Learn [Internet]. 2021;13(3):273-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2020.10.002

Cortright RN, Collins HL, DiCarlo SE. Peer instruction enhanced meaningful learning: ability to solve novel problems. Adv Physiol Educ [Internet]. 2005;29:107-11. doi: https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00060.2004

Chisini LA, Conde MC, Alves AM, Costa FS. Flipped classroom and the use of role-play in the COVID-19 pandemic: challenges and learning. Braz J Oral Sci [Internet]. 2022;21:e225368. doi: https://doi.org/10.20396/bjos.v21i00.8665368

Bergmann J, Sams A. Sala de aula invertida: uma metodologia ativa de aprendizagem.1th. Rio de Janeiro: LTC; 2019 [cited 2025 Jun 09]. Available from: https://www.scielo.br/j/epec/a/3KTJLqNJLmZzC3qfczL3L8d/?format=pdf

Caldwell JE. Clickers in the large classroom: current research and best-practice tips. CBE Life Sci Educ [Internet]. 2007;6(1):9-20. doi: https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.06-12-0205

Lopes JL, Freitas MAO, Domingues TAM, Ohl RIB, Barros ALBL. Metodologia da problematização: estratégia de ensino para a aprendizagem do procedimento de terapia. Ciênc Cuid Saúde [Internet]. 2016;15(1):187-93. doi: https://doi.org/10.4025/ciencuidsaude.v15i1.26436

Lasry N, Mazur E, Watkins J. Peer instruction: from Harvard to the two-year college. Am J Phys [Internet]. 2008;76:1066. doi: https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2978182

Dale E. Edition of audio-visual methods in teaching [Internet]. 3th. NewYork: Dryden. 1969.

Ferraz A, Belhot R. Taxonomia de Bloom: revisão teórica e apresentação das adequações do instrumento para definição de objetivos instrucionais. Gest Prod [Internet]. 2010;17(2):421-31. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-530X2010000200015

Descargas

Publicado

2025-07-01

Cómo citar

Grave, L. Q., Salvi, L. C., Costa, F. dos S., Grave, M. T. Q., & Chisini, L. A. (2025). Instrucción entre Pares como estrategia de aprendizaje activo en odontología. Brazilian Journal of Dental Education, 25, 2435 . https://doi.org/10.30979/BrazJDentEduc.v25.2435

Número

Sección

Articles