Evaluación de usabilidad, percepción de utilidad y validación de aplicacíon de studio de odontología restauradora
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30979/BrazJDentEduc.v25.2448Palabras clave:
Telemedicina, Educación Continua en Odontología, Operatoria DentalResumen
El objetivo fue desarrollar una aplicación, evaluar su usabilidad y utilidad percibida, además de validarla en diferentes grupos para identificar a qué grupo está más dirigida. La “Guía de estudio clínico de procedimientos restaurativos” fue desarrollada por expertos en Odontología Restauradora. Se accede al contenido a través de dos pestañas: “Guía de Materiales”, que presenta los materiales y protocolos, y “Evaluación Dental”, que dirige al usuario al grado de afectación dental, estado pulpar y lo dirige a un protocolo de tratamiento específico. La evaluación fue realizada por 15 especialistas en odontología restauradora utilizando la escala de usabilidad System Utility Score (SUS) y el Modelo de Aceptación de Tecnología (TAM). Fue validado por estudiantes de tercer, quinto y décimo semestre de pregrado, estudiantes de posgrado lato sensu en odontología y odontólogos de atención primaria de Fortaleza, Ceará, Brasil (n=15). Los participantes utilizaron y evaluaron la aplicación mediante los cuestionarios SUS y TAM. Los valores obtenidos se compararon mediante la prueba de Wilcoxon y correlación de Spearman. En la evaluación por especialista se obtuvieron puntuaciones de 90.6 en el SUS y 68.0 en el TAM. En la validación se obtuvieron puntuaciones globales de 87.7 y 91.2 para el SUS y el TAM, respectivamente. Al comparar los grupos, los puntajes fueron mayores para los estudiantes de pregrado en comparación con los profesionales, SUS (p=0.037) y TAM (p=0.031). La aplicación brinda soporte de información clínica para la comunidad odontológica, demostrando ser una potencial guía de estudio para profesionales y estudiantes, estando más dirigida a estudiantes de pregrado.
Citas
Chahande DJ, Deshmukh DS. Perception of undergraduate dental students about use of smartphones in dentistry: an efficient teaching-learning tool during covid - 19 pandemic. AJMRR [Internet]. 2022:19;3(2):138-52. [cited 2024 Oct 07]. doi: https://doi.org/10.55662/ajmrr.2022.3205
Pilcher L, Pahlke S, Urquhart O, O’Brien KK, Dhar V, Fontana M, et al. Direct materials for restoring caries lesions: systematic review and meta-analysis-a report of the American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs. JADA [Internet]. 2023;154(2):e1-98. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adaj.2022.09.012
Martins MT, Sardenberg F, Vale MP, Paiva SM, Pordeus IA. Dental caries and social factors: impact on quality of life in Brazilian children. Braz Oral Res [Internet]. 2015;29(1):0133. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2015.vol29.0133
Lee M, Lee H, Kim Y, Kim J, Cho M, Jang J, et al. Mobile app-based health promotion programs: a systematic review of the literature. IJERPH [Internet]. 2018;15(12):2838. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15122838
Land-Zandstra AM, Devilee JLA, Snik F, Buurmeijer F, Van Den Broek JM. Citizen science on a smartphone: participants’ motivations and learning. Public Underst Sci [Internet]. 2016;25(1):45-60. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662515602406
Namakian M, Subar P, Glassman P, Quade R, Harrington M. In-Person Versus “Virtual” Dental Examination: Congruence Between Decision-Making Modalities. CDA [Internet]. 2012;40(7):587–95. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/19424396.2012.12220931
Ozdalga E, Ozdalga A, Ahuja N. The Smartphone in Medicine: A Review of Current and Potential Use Among Physicians and Students. J Med Internet Res [Internet]. 2012;14(5):e1994. doi: https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1994
Visser BJ, Bouman J. There’s a medical app for that. BMJ. 2012;344:e2162.
Adams NE. Bloom’s taxonomy of cognitive learning objectives. J Med Libr Assoc [Internet]. 2015;103(3):152-3. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/sbmj.e2162
Zessis NR, Dube AR, Sadanand A, Cole JJ, Hrach CM, Daud YN. Teaching scripts via smartphone app facilitate resident-led teaching of medical students. BMC Med Educ [Internet]. 2021;21(1):33. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02782-w
Goob J, Possert P, Klören M, Erdelt K, Güth JF, Edelhoff D, et al. First evaluation of an app to optimize and organize the processes and assessments in dental clinical courses. BMC Med Educ [Internet]. 2022;22(1):872. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03945-z
Wang W. Influences of education app-assisted teaching technology on learning efficacy of learners. Int J Emerg Technol Learn [Internet]. 2022;17(21):4-16. doi: https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v17i21.35369
Zhang J, Zhang P. Influence of APP-assisted teaching on teaching quality in mobile learning. Int J Emerg Technol Learn [Internet]. 2023;18(9):4-16. doi: https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v18i09.37827
Teixeira D, Maritan B, Gonçalves B. Um modelo de fluxo para design de livro digital infantil. 2016. In XX Congreso de la Sociedad Iberoamericana de Gráfica Digital. São Paulo: Blucher; 2016. doi: https://doi.org/10.5151/despro-sigradi2016-571
Sousa VEC, Lopez KD. Towards usable E-health. Appl Clin Inform [Internet]. 2017;08(2):470-90. doi: https://doi.org/10.4338/ACI-2016-10-R-0170
Nielsen J. 10 Usability heuristics for user interface design. 1994 [cited 2024 Oct 07]. Available from: https://www.nngroup.com/articles/ten-usability-heuristics/
Sauro J, Lewis JR. Quantifying the user experience: practical statistics for user research. Estados Unidos: Morgan Kaufmann; 2016 [cited 2024 Oct 07]. 374 p. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-384968-7.00002-3
Borsci S, Federici S, Lauriola M. On the dimensionality of the System Usability Scale: a test of alternative measurement models. Cogn Process [Internet]. 2009;10(3):193–7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-009-0268-9
Macedo FS, Silva PGB, Marçal EBF, Rolim JPML. Evaluation of usability, perception of usefulness, and efficiency of an application in interpreting imaging examinations and supporting decision-making in orthopedics. Telemed J E Health [Internet]. 2021;27(5):561–7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2020.0108
Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly [Internet]. 1989;13(3):319-40. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Seixas CA, Godoy S, Martins JCA, Mazzo A, Baptista RCN, Mendes IAC. Usability assessment of moodle by Brazilian and Portuguese nursing students. Comput Inform Nurs [Internet]. 2016;34(6):266. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/CIN.0000000000000237
Silveira DV, Marcolino MS, Machado EL, Ferreira CG, Alkmim MBM, Resende ES, et al. Development and evaluation of a mobile decision support system for hypertension management in the Primary Care setting in Brazil: mixed-methods field study on usability, feasibility, and utility. JMIR Health and Health [Internet]. 2019:25;7(3):e9869. doi: https://doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.9869
Bangor A, Kortum PT, Miller JT. An empirical evaluation of the System Usability Scale. Int J Hum-Comput Int [Internet]. 2008;24(6):574–94. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10447310802205776
Lee Y, Kozar KA, Larsen KRT. The Technology Acceptance Model: past, present, and future. CAIS [Internet]. 2003 [cited 2024 Jan 22];12:752-780. doi: https://doi.org/10.17705/1cais.01250
Mitov G, Dillschneider T, Abed MR, Hohenberg G, Pospiech P. Introducing and evaluating MorphoDent, a web-based learning program in dental morphology. JDE [Internet]. 2010;74(10):1133–9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.0022-0337.2010.74.10.tb04968.x
Sharma S, Mohanty V, Balappanavar AY, Chahar P, Rijhwani K. Role of digital media in promoting oral health: a systematic review. Cureus [Internet]. 2022;14(9):e28893. doi: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.28893.ecollection
Braz MA, Rivaldo EG, Moura FRR, Cruz RA, Brew MC, Haddad AE, et al. Aplicativos móveis para ensino e assistência odontológica: uma revisão integrativa. Rev ABENO [Internet]. 2018;18(3):118-90. doi: https://doi.org/10.30979/rev.abeno.v18i3.574
Kalman L. Development of a novel dental shade determination application. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects [Internet]. 2020;14(1):73–6. doi: https://doi.org/10.34172/joddd.2020.011
Buijink AWG, Visser BJ, Marshall L. Medical apps for smartphones: lack of evidence undermines quality and safety. Evid Based Med [Internet]. 2013;18(3):90–2. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/eb-2012-100885
Figueiredo M, Barone D, Jardim LE. New challenges for informatics: design and implementation of a mobile system dedicated to improve oral health conditions. In Actas del Congreso Internacional de Informática Educativa. p. 707-710. 2013 [cited 2024 Oct 07]. Available from: https://www.tise.cl/volumen9/TISE2013/707-710.pdf
Ribeiro YJS, Ferreira LG, Nelson-Filho P, Arnez MFM, Paula-Silva FWG. Influence of digital media in the oral health education of mother-child pairs: study protocol of a parallel double-blind randomized clinical trial. Trials [Internet]. 2022;23(1):639. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06602-4
University knowledge in an age of supercomplexity. High Educ [Internet]. 2000;40:409-422. doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004159513741
Leadbeatter D, Peck C. Are dental students ready for supercomplex dental practice? Eur J Dent Educ [Internet]. 2018;22(1):e116-21. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/eje.12268
Payne KFB, Wharrad H, Watts K. Smartphone and medical related App use among medical students and junior doctors in the United Kingdom (UK): a regional survey. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak [Internet]. 2012:12(1):121. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-12-121
Zhang C, Fan L, Chai Z, Yu C, Song J. Smartphone and medical application use among dentists in China. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak [Internet]. 2020;20(1):213. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-020-01238-3
