Level of knowledge of undergraduate dental students about electronic cigarettes

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30979/rev.abeno.v21i1.1099

Keywords:

Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems. Knowledge. Education, Dental.

Abstract

The electronic cigarette has emerged as an alternative to the conventional cigarette, being considered by some as a smoking cessation aid. The device has attracted the interest of many young people in search of new experiences, sensations, and recreation. The aim of this study was to assess, using a questionnaire, the level of knowledge of undergraduate dental students from the Federal University of Santa Catarina (Florianópolis, Brazil) about electronic cigarettes. Information was also collected on the interest in trying the device, the approach of the subject in the course, and the self-perceived ability to inform patients about electronic cigarettes. The questionnaire was applied in April and May 2019 to 209 students over 18 years old, who were divided into 3 groups: freshmen (1st and 2nd semesters of the course), junior (4th and 5th semesters), and senior (9th and 10th semesters). The descriptive and statistical analyses were performed, and the significance level of 95% was adopted. The results showed that senior students had higher knowledge about electronic cigarettes than freshmen or junior students. However, the level of knowledge was considered unsatisfactory, as about 40% of the senior students had adequate level of knowledge (at least 60% of correct answers). Most students reported not having had contact with the topic during the undergraduate course. Likewise, most senior students reported not feeling prepared to advise patients on electronic cigarettes. The results of this study indicate the dental curriculum should include this topic in the training of future dentists, enabling them to inform their patients about the risks and benefits of using electronic cigarettes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Eduarda Coelho Guckert, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina

Cirurgiã-dentista graduada pela Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina.

Caroline Zimmermann, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina

Doutora em Odontologia (Diagnóstico Bucal) pela Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina.

Maria Inês Meurer, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina

Professora Associado do Departamento de Patologia da Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina.

References

Pinto MT, Pichon-Riviere A, Bardach A. Estimativa da carga do tabagismo no Brasil: mortalidade, morbidade e custos. Cad Saude Publica. 2015 Jun;31(6):1283-97.

Manzoli L, La Vecchia C, Flacco ME, Capasso L, Simonetti V, Boccia S, et al. Multicentric cohort study on the long-term efficacy and safety of electronic cigarettes: study design and methodology. BMC Public Health. 2013 Dec 24;13(1):883.

Hartmann-Boyce J, McRobbie H, Bullen C, Begh R, Stead LF, Hajek P. Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Sep 13;2016(9):178-9.

Adriaens K, Van Gucht D, Declerck P, Baeyens F. Effectiveness of the electronic cigarette: an eight-week flemish study with six-month follow-up on smoking reduction, craving and experienced benefits and complaints. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014 Oct 29;11(11):11220-48.

Bullen C, Howe C, Laugesen M, McRobbie H, Parag V, Williman J, et al. Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2013 Nov;382(9905):1629-37.

Caponnetto P, Campagna D, Cibella F, Morjaria JB, Caruso M, Russo C, et al. EffiCiency and Safety of an eLectronic cigAreTte (ECLAT) as tobacco cigarettes substitute: a prospective 12-month randomized control design study. PLoS One. 2013 Jun 24;8(6):e66317.

Hajek P, Phillips-Waller A, Przulj D, Pesola F, Myers Smith K, Bisal N, et al. A randomized trial of e-cigarettes versus nicotine-replacement therapy. N Engl J Med. 2019 Feb 14;380(7):629-37.

Roditis M, Delucchi K, Cash D, Halpern-Felsher B. Adolescents’ perceptions of health risks, social risks, and benefits differ across tobacco products. J Adolesc Heal. 2016/04/25. 2016 May;58(5):558-66.

Walley SC, Wilson KM, Winickoff JP, Groner J. A public health crisis: electronic cigarettes, vape, and JUUL. Pediatrics. 2019 Jun 23;143(6):e20182741.

Willett JG, Bennett M, Hair EC, Xiao H, Greenberg MS, Harvey E, et al. Recognition, use and perceptions of JUUL among youth and young adults. Tob Control. 2018 Apr 18; tobaccocontrol-2018-

Krishnan-Sarin S, Jackson A, Morean M, Kong G, Bold KW, Camenga DR, et al. E-cigarette devices used by high-school youth. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2019 Jan;194:395-400.

INCA - Instituto Nacional de Câncer. Cigarros eletrônicos: o que sabemos? Estudo sobre a composição do vapor e danos à saúde, o papel na redução de danos e no tratamento da dependência de nicotina. Rio de Janeiro; 2016. 120 p.

Jimenez Ruiz CA, Solano Reina S, de Granda Orive JI, Signes-Costa Minaya J, de Higes Martinez E, Riesco Miranda JA, et al. El cigarrillo electrónico. Declaración oficial de la Sociedad Española de Neumología y Cirugía Torácica (SEPAR) sobre la eficacia, seguridad y regulación de los cigarrillos electrónicos. Arch Bronconeumol. 2014/04/02. 2014 Aug;50(8):362-7.

Sultan AS, Jessri M, Farah CS. Electronic nicotine delivery systems: Oral health implications and oral cancer risk. J Oral Pathol Med. 2018 Dec 14;jop.12810.

ANVISA - Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária. Resolução RDC No. 46, de 28 de agosto de 2009 [Internet]. BRAZIL; 2009 p. 2. [Acesso em: 8 de março de 2021]. Disponível em: http://bvsms.saude.gov.br/

bvs/saudelegis/anvisa/2009/res0046_28_08_2009.html.

Cavalcante TM, Szklo AS, Perez C de A, Thrasher JF, Szklo M, Ouimet J, et al. Conhecimento e uso de cigarros eletrônicos e percepção de risco no Brasil: resultados de um país com requisitos regulatórios rígidos. Cad Saude Publica. 2017/09/28. 2017 Sep 21;33(suppl 3):e00074416.

Phillips JA. Electronic cigarettes: health risks and workplace policy. workplace health saf. 2014/09/11. 2014 Sep;62(9):396-396.

Perrine CG, Pickens CM, Boehmer TK, King BA, Jones CM, DeSisto CL, et al. Characteristics of a multistate outbreak of lung injury associated with E-cigarette Use, or vaping - United States, 2019. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2019 Oct 4;68(39):860-4.

Vaught B, Spellman J, Shah A, Stewart A, Mullin D. Facial trauma caused by electronic cigarette explosion. Ear Nose Throat J. 2017/03/28. 2017 Mar;96(3):139-42.

Villanti AC, Rath JM, Williams VF, Pearson JL, Richardson A, Abrams DB, et al. Impact of Exposure to Electronic Cigarette Advertising on Susceptibility and Trial of Electronic cigarettes and cigarettes in US young adults: a randomized controlled trial. Nicotine Tob Res. 2015/11/18. 2016 May;18(5):1331-9.

Caponnetto P, Campagna D, Papale G, Russo C, Polosa R. The emerging phenomenon of electronic cigarettes. Expert Rev Respir Med. 2012 Feb 9;6(1):63-74.

Directorate-General for Communication (European Commission). Attitudes of Europeans towards tobacco and electronic cigarettes [Internet]. European Union; 2017. [Acesso em: 08 de março de 2021]. Disponível em: https://op.europa.eu/en/publi cation-detail/-/publi cation/2f01a3d1-0af2-11e8-966a-01aa75ed71a1.

Goniewicz ML, Knysak J, Gawron M, Kosmider L, Sobczak A, Kurek J, et al. Levels of selected carcinogens and toxicants in vapour from electronic cigarettes. Tob Control. 2014 Mar;23(2):133-9.

MacDonald A, Middlekauff HR. Electronic cigarettes and cardiovascular health: what do we know so far? Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2019 Jun; 15:159-74.

Tomar SL, Fox CH, Connolly GN. Electronic cigarettes. The tobacco industry’s latest threat to oral health? J Am Dent Assoc. 2015/09/01. 2015 Sep;146(9):651-3.

Farsalinos K, Romagna G, Tsiapras D, Kyrzopoulos S, Voudris V. Evaluation of Electronic Cigarette use (vaping) topography and estimation of liquid consumption: implications for research protocol standards definition and for public health authorities’ regulation. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2013 Jun 18;10(6):2500-14.

Czogala J, Goniewicz ML, Fidelus B, Zielinska-Danch W, Travers MJ, Sobczak A. Secondhand exposure to vapors from Electronic Cigarettes. Nicotine Tob Res. 2014 Jun;16(6):655-62.

Prochnow JA. E-cigarettes: A practical, evidence-based guide for advanced practice nurses. J Nurse Pract. 2017 Jul;13(7):449-55.

National Centre for Smoking Cessation and Training (NCSCT). Eletronic cigarettes [Internet]. London (UK): National Centre for Smoking Cessation and Training (NCSCT); 2014. p. 16. [Acesso em: 18 de novembro de 2019]. Disponível em: https://www.ncsct. co.uk/.

Martín Carreras-Presas C, Naeim M, Hsiou D, Somacarrera Pérez ML, Messadi D V. The need to educate future dental professionals on E-cigarette effects. Eur J Dent Educ. 2018 Nov;22(4):e751-8.

Natto ZS. Dental Students’ Knowledge and attitudes about Electronic Cigarettes: a cross-sectional study at one Saudi University. J Dent Educ. 2019;83(10):37-9.

Published

24-12-2021

How to Cite

Guckert, E. C., Zimmermann, C., & Meurer, M. I. (2021). Level of knowledge of undergraduate dental students about electronic cigarettes. Revista Da ABENO, 21(1), 1099. https://doi.org/10.30979/rev.abeno.v21i1.1099

Issue

Section

Article