Evaluation of 4 dental curricula based on students’ expectations and satisfaction – report of Brazilian and Norwegian experiences
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30979/rev.abeno.v9i2.1314Keywords:
Dental Education. Curriculum Development. Competency. Expectations. Satisfaction.Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate four dental curricula (two in Norway and two in Brazil), based on students’ and teachers’ satisfaction. Structured questionnaires were constructed. This investigation was performed during a change in the curriculum from a traditional approach (discipline oriented) to an integrated, problem-based learning approach. Both of the Brazilian curricula were traditional. Twenty-two students from the old curriculum (UiO – old) and 17 students from the new curriculum in Oslo (UiO – new), and twenty-five students from each Brazilian university were included (UFRGS and ULBRA). Leaders of disciplines in the universities also participated (UiO, n=17, UFRGS, n=10, ULBRA, n=13). Most students and teachers had the opinion that their curriculum enabled dentists to combine public and private practices and to work worldwide. Regardless of curriculum, the students reported doubts about their competence in performing large fixed prostheses, complex orthodontics, placement and maintenance of implants, treatment of craniofacial disorders and planning of community oral health programs. The evaluation of the quality of the theoretical and clinical guidance revealed that the students were mostly satisfied. As an overall evaluation, a VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) was applied to assess students’ and teachers’ satisfaction. The results did not show any statistically significant difference (ANOVA, a=.05) among students (7.12, 7.36, 6.8 and 6.8) for UiO – old, UiO – new, UFRGS and ULBRA, respectively. We concluded that some culturally dependent differences between Norway and Brazil could be detected, and that teachers who were in the process of changing a curriculum expressed higher satisfaction with the new approach.Downloads
References
Farge P, Virieux J, Doury J. Student satisfaction with curriculum modifications in a French dental school. Eur J Dent Educ 2000:4: 112-117.
Federal Council of Dentistry, Brazil. www.cfo.org.br
Fiehn N-E. The basic science teaching experience in the Nordic countries. Eur J Dent Educ 1998: 2: 115-123.
Greenwood F, Townsend G, Joseph V, Wetherell J. Introducing Adelaide dental students to a problem-based learning curriculum. Eur J Dent Educ 1999: 3: 15-19.
Greenwood LF, Townsend GC,Wetherell JD, Mullins GA. Selfperceived competency at graduation: a comparison of dental graduates from the Adelaide PBL curriculum and the Toronto traditional curriculum. Eur J Dent Educ 1999: 3: 153-158
Lum-Peng L, Ai-Yen, C. Challenges and relevance of problembased learning in dental education. Eur J Dent Educ 1999: 3:20-26.
Neufeld VR, Barrows HS. The Mc Master Philosophy: an approach to medical education. J Med Educ 1974: 20: 267-273.
Norwegian Dental Association, Norway. www.tannlegeforeningen.no
Pau AKH, Collinson S, Croucher R. Dental students’ evaluation of 2 community-oriented PBL modules. Eur J Dent Educ 1999:3: 159-166.
Widström E, Birn H, Haugejorden O, Martinsson T. Dental student’s views on their education and study circumstances in Nordic countries. Swed Dent J 1990: 14: 115-122.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Autores que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:
a) Autores mantém os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons Attribution que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
b) Autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
c) Autores têm permissão e são estimulados a publicar e distribuir seu trabalho online (ex.: em repositórios institucionais ou na sua página pessoal) a qualquer ponto antes ou durante o processo editorial, já que isso pode gerar alterações produtivas, bem como aumentar o impacto e a citação do trabalho publicado (Veja O Efeito do Acesso Livre).
