Undergraduate dental students’use perception of different endodontic instruments for mechanical– chemical preparation
a systematic review of laboratory studies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30979/revabeno.v22i2.1616Keywords:
Stainless Steel, Endodontics, Students Dental, Root Canal Preparation, Systematic ReviewAbstract
This literature review aimed to compare undergraduate dental students’ perceptions regarding the use of nickel titanium (NiTi) and stainless steel instruments for the mechanical-chemical preparation of root canals, focusing on quality and time. PubMed, LILACS, Scopus, Embase, SciELO, and CENTRAL electronic databases were accessed to verify and select related studies published as of January 2021. Laboratory studies comparing the use of NiTi instruments with stainless steel instruments by undergraduate dental students were evaluated. Two reviewers independently selected the studies, collected the data, and analyzed the risk of bias. Out of the 92 potentially relevant studies, 10 met the inclusion criteria for a full-text analysis and were subsequently included in the systematic review. The risk of bias was considered high in all studies. Undergraduate dental students demonstrated a greater preference for and better perception of NiTi instruments. NiTi instruments also resulted in less time for and better quality of the mechanical chemical preparation. These were associated with a lower incidence of accidents, such as canal ledges, transportations, and deviations, as well as a higher incidence of instrument fractures.
Downloads
References
Grock CH. Experiências relacionadas à execução de tratamentos endodônticos de urgência e níveis de ansiedade, qualidade do sono e qualidade de vida em alunos de graduação em odontologia. 2016. Dissertação (Mestrado em Odontologia) - Faculdade de Odontologia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, 2016.
Simi Junior J, Medeiros JMF, Risso VA, Albetman CS. Avaliaçäo das dificuldades clínicas identificadas por acadêmicos do curso de graduaçäo em relaçäo às diversas etapas do tratamento endodôntico. Odontol USF. 1998; 16(1):11-8.
Liu SB, Fan B, Cheung GS, Peng B, Fan MW, Gutmann JL, Song YL, Fu Q, Bian Z, et al. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability of rotary ProTaper compared with rotary GT and manual K Flexofile. Am J Dent. 2006; 19(6):353-8.
Cheung GS, Liu CS. A retrospective study of endodontic treatment outcome between nickel-titanium rotary and stainless steel hand filing techniques. J Endod. 2009; 35(7):938-43.
Del Fabbro M, Afrashtehfar KI, Corbella S, El-Kabbaney A, Perondi I, Taschieri S. In Vivo and In Vitro Effectiveness of Rotary Nickel-Titanium vs Manual Stainless Steel Instruments for Root Canal Therapy: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2018; 18 (1):59-69.
Sydney GB, Santos IM, Batista A, Kowalczuck A, Deonizio MDA. A implementação do uso dos sistemas rotatórios em endodontia. Rev Odontol Bras Central. 2014; 23(65):113-20.
Gambill JM., Alder M, Del Rio CE. Comparison of nickel-titanium and stainless steel hand-file instrumentation using computed tomography. J Endod. 1996;22(7):369-75.
Gekelman D, Ramamurthy R, Mirfarsi S, Paqué F, Peters OA. Rotary nickel-titanium GT and ProTaper files for root canal shaping by novice operators: a radiographic and micro-computed tomography evaluation. J Endod. 2009; 35(11):1584-8.
Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gotzsche PC, Ioannidis JPA, Clarke M, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLOS Medicine. 2009;6(7):e1000100.
Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page M.J, Welch VA. (ed.). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.2. Cochrane, 2021.
Gluskin AH, Brown DC, Buchanan LS. A reconstructed computerized tomographic comparison of Ni-Ti rotary GT™ files versus traditional instruments in canals shaped by novice operators. Int Endod J. 2001;34(6):476-84. 12. Sonntag D, Guntermann A, Kim SK, Stachniss V. Root canal shaping with manual stainless steel files and rotary Ni-Ti files performed by students. Int Endod J. 2003;36(4):246-55.
Faria AGM, Rocha RG, Perez FEG. Análise do índice e ângulo do desvio apical através de técnica de instrumentação manual e automatizada, realizada por alunos de graduação em odontologia da Universidade Federal do Pará e do Centro Universitário do Pará. Rev Odontol Univ Cid Sao Paulo. 2006;18(3):211-7.
Leonardi DP, Haragushiku GA, Tomazinho FSF, Furuse AY, Volpato L, Baratto-filho F. Undergraduate students introduction to manual and rotary root canal instrumentation. Bull Tokyo Dent Coll. 2012;53(3):155-9.
Alves RAA, Souza JB, Alencar AHG, Pécora JD, Estrela C. Detection of Procedural Errors with Stainless Steel and NiTi Instruments by Undergraduate Students Using Conventional Radiograph and Cone Beam Computed Tomography. Iran Endo J. 2013;8(4):160-5.
Alrahabi M. Comparative study of rootcanal shaping with stainless steel and rotary NiTi files performed by preclinical dental students. Technol Health Care. 2015; 23(3):257-65.
Kwak SW, Cheung GSP, Ha JH, Kim SK, Lee H, Kim HC. Preference of undergraduate students after first experience on nickel-titanium endodontic instruments. Restor Dent Endod. 2016;41(3):176-81.
Georgelin-Gurgel M, Devillard R, Lauret ME, Diemer F, Calas P, Hennequin M. Root canal shaping using rotary nickel-titanium files in preclinical teaching. Odontostomatol Trop. 2008; 3 (121):5-11.
Himel VT, Ahmed KM, Wood DM, Alhadainy HA. An evaluation of nitinol and stainless steel files used by dental students during a laboratory proficiency exam. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1995;79(2):232-7.
Jungnickel L, Kruse C, Vaeth M, Kirkevang LL. Quality aspects of ex vivo root canal treatments done by undergraduate dental students using four different endodontic treatment systems. Acta Odontol Scand. 2018;73(3):169-74.
Siqueira Junior JS, Rôças IN, Lopes HP, Alves FRF, Oliveira JCM, Armada L, et al. Princípios biológicos do tratamento endodôntico de dentes com polpa necrosada e lesão perirradicular. Rev Bras Odontol. 2012;69(1):8-14.
Hoppe CB. Fatores clínicos e radiográficos associados ao sucesso do tratamento endodôntico. Dissertação (Doutorado em Odontologia) - Faculdade de Odontologia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, 2018.
Cotton TP, Geisler TM, Holden DT, Schwartz SA, Schindler WG. Endodontic applications of cone beam volumetric tomography. J Endod. 2007;33(9):1121-32.
Fabricio FK. Fratura de instrumentos no sistema de canais radiculares : tratamento e prognóstico. Trabalho de conclusão de especialização - Faculdade de Odontologia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, 2014.
Melo TAF, Weber A, Menon D, Soares RG, Salles AA. Analysis of the influence of degree of curvature in the occurrence of apical deviations after the oscillatory preparation in simulated root canals. Rev Sul-Bras Odontol. 2010;7(3):312-9.
Schneider SW. A comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved root canals. Texas Oral Surgery. 1971;32(2):271-5.
Lopes HP, Elias CN, Moreira EJL, do Prado MAR, Marques RVL, Pereira OLS. Expansion of the apical preparation in curved canals according to the endodontic instruments flexibility. Rev Bras Odontol. 2009;66(1):93-6.
Gergi R, Rjeily JA, Sader J, Naaman A. Comparison of Canal Transportation and Centering Ability of Twisted Files, PathfileProTaper System, and Stainless Steel Hand K-Files by Using Computed Tomography. J Endod. 2010;36(5):904-7.
Aydin C, Tunca YM, Senses Z, Baysallar M, Kayaoglu G, Orstavik D. Bacterial reduction by extensive versus conservative root canal instrumentation in vitro. Acta Odontol Scand. 2009;65:167-70.
Santos MFA. O sistema reciprocante na endodontia (Reciproc e Wave One): revisão de literatura. Trabalho de conclusão de curso - Faculdade de Odontologia Maria Milza, Governador Mangabeira, 2017.
Abu-Tahun I, El-Ma’aita A, Khraisat A. Satisfaction of undergraduate students at University of Jordan after root canal treatment of posterior teeth using rotary or hand preparation. Aust Endod 2016;42(2):66-72.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Revista da ABENO
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Autores que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:
a) Autores mantém os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons Attribution que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
b) Autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
c) Autores têm permissão e são estimulados a publicar e distribuir seu trabalho online (ex.: em repositórios institucionais ou na sua página pessoal) a qualquer ponto antes ou durante o processo editorial, já que isso pode gerar alterações produtivas, bem como aumentar o impacto e a citação do trabalho publicado (Veja O Efeito do Acesso Livre).
