Repair of defective resin composite restorations in primary teeth: current trends in Brazilian undergraduate Dental programs
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30979/rev.abeno.v20i1.1046Palabras clave:
Dental Restoration Failure. Education, Dental. Pediatric Dentistry. Students, Dental.Resumen
This study investigated the teaching of direct resin composite restoration repair in primary teeth in undergraduate dental programs within Brazil. A questionnaire relating to this topic was developed and e-mailed to 205 undergraduate dental schools between May and September 2019. Data obtained were analyzed descriptively. The response rate was 43.4% and out of those responding schools, 82% included this topic within their curriculum. Two of the most commonly reported reasons for teaching repair of resin composite restorations were dental structure preservation (95.9%), and reduction in the risk of pulp complications (71.2%). With regard to protocol for repair, few schools (24.7%) taught mechanical roughening of the resin portion to be repaired with diamond burs. Conversely, phosphoric acid etching was recommended by 87.7% of schools and 76.7% indicated adhesive application into prepared surface. The most commonly taught material for repair was conventional resin composite. The teaching the repair of failed resin composite restorations has been established within the curriculum of undergraduate dental programs in Brazil. However, there is no consensus for the clinical protocol for repair.
Descargas
Citas
(1) Lynch CD, Blum IR, Frazier KB, Haisch LD, Wilson NHF. Repair or replacement of defective direct resin-based composite restorations. J Am Dent Assoc. 2012;143 (2):157-63.
(2) Ruiz LF, Nicoloso GF, Franzon R, Lenzi TL, de Araujo FB, Casagrande L. Repair increases the survival of failed primary teeth restorations in high-caries risk children: a university-based retrospective study. Clin Oral Investig. 2020; 24(17):71-7.
(3) Casagrande L, Laske M, Bronkhorst EM, Huysmans MCDNJM, Opdam NJM. Repair may increase survival of direct posterior restorations - A practice based study. J Dent. 2017;64:30-6.
(4) Hickel R, Brüshaver K, Ilie N. Repair of restorations - Criteria for decision making and clinical recommendations. Dent Mater. 2013;29(1):28-50.
(5) Gordan V V, Riley J, Geraldeli S, Williams OD, Spoto JC, Gilbert GH., et al. The decision to repair or replace a defective restoration is affected by who placed the original restoration: Findings from the National Dental PBRN. J Dent. 2014;42 (12):1528-34.
(6) Lynch C, Hayashi M, Seow L, Blum I, Wilson N. The Management of defective resin composite restorations: current trends in Dental school teaching in Japan. Oper Dent. 2013;38(5):497-504.
(7) Blum IR, Lynch CD, Wilson NHF. Teaching of the repair of defective composite restorations in Scandinavian dental schools. J Oral Rehabil. 2012;39(3):210-6.
(8) Lynch CD, Blum IR, Frazier KB, Haisch LD, Wilson NHF. Repair or replacement of defective direct resin-based composite restorations: contemporary teaching in U.S. and Canadian dental schools. J Am Dent Assoc. 2012;143(2):157-63.
(9) Kanzow P, Wiegand A, Göstemeyer G, Schwendicke F. Understanding the management and teaching of dental restoration repair: Systematic review and meta-analysis of surveys. J Dent. 2018;69:1-21.
(10) Paranhos MC, Pires CW, Lenzi TL, Casagrande L, Rocha RO. Graduate and undergraduate teaching of primary tooth pulpectomy: A comparison among Brazilian dental schools. Pesqui Bras Odontopediatria Clin Integr. 2019;19(1):1-10.
(11) Bergoli AD, Primosch RE, de Araujo FB, Ardenghi TM, Casagrande L. Pulp therapy in primary teeth--profile of teaching in Brazilian dental schools. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2010 Winter;35(2):191-5.
(12) Blum IR, Lynch CD, Wilson NHF. Teaching of direct composite restoration repair in undergraduate dental schools in the United Kingdom and Ireland. Eur J Dent Educ. 2012;16(1):e53-8.
(13) Brasil. Conselho Nacional de Educação. Câmara de Educação Superior. Resolução CNE/CES 3/2002, de 19 de fevereiro de 2002. Institui as Diretrizes Curriculares Nacionais do Curso de Graduação em Odontologia. Seç. 1 mar 4, 2002.
(14) Gordan V V, Riley JL, Rindal DB, Qvist V, Fellows JL, Dilbone DA, et al. Repair or replacement of restorations: A prospective cohort study by dentists in The National Dental Practice-Based Research Network. J Am Dent Assoc. 2015;146 (12):895-903.
(15) Demarco FF, Corrêa MB, Cenci MS, Moraes RR ON. Longevity of posterior composite restorations: not only a matter of materials. Dent Mater. 2012;28(1):87-101.
(16) Ávila NM, Bottezini PA, Nicoloso GF, Araujo FB, Ardenghi TM, Lenzi TL, et al. Prevalence of defective restorations and factors associated with reintervention in primary teeth: A retrospective university‐based study. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2019;29(5):566-72.
(17) Hickel R, Peschke A, Tyas M, Mjör I, Bayne S, Peters M, et al. FDI World Dental Federation - clinical criteria for the evaluation of direct and indirect restorations. Update and clinical examples. J Adhes Dent. 2010;12(4):259-72.
(18) Bayne SC, Schmalz G. Reprinting the classic article on USPHS evaluation methods for measuring the clinical research performance of restorative materials. Clin Oral Investig. 2005;9(4):209-14.
(19) Mjör IA, Toffenetti F. Secondary caries: a literature review with case reports. Quintessence Int. 2000;31(3):165-79.
(20) Valente LL, Sarkis-Onofre R, Gonçalves AP, Fernández E, Loomans B, Moraes RR. Repair bond strength of dental composites: systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Adhes Adhes. 2016;69:15-26.
(21) Fornazari I, Wille I, Meda E, Brum R, Souza E. Effect of Surface Treatment, Silane, and Universal Adhesive on Microshear Bond Strength of Nanofilled Composite Repairs. Oper Dent. 2017;42(4):367-74.
(22) Fawzy AS, El-Askary FS, Amer MA. Effect of surface treatments on the tensile bond strength of repaired water-aged anterior restorative micro-fine hybrid resin composite. J Dent. 2008;36(12):969-76.
(23) Eliasson S, Tibballs J, Dahl J. Effect of Different Surface Treatments and Adhesives on Repair Bond Strength of Resin Composites After One and 12 Months of Storage Using an Improved Microtensile Test Method. Oper Dent. 2014;39(5):E206-16.
(24) Kashi TJ, Erfan M, Rakhshan V, Aghabaigi N, Tabatabaei F. An In Vitro assessment of the effects of three surface treatments on repair bond strength of aged composites. Oper Dent. 2011;36(6):608-17.
(25) Çakir N, Demirbuga S, Balkaya H, Karadaş M. Bonding performance of universal adhesives on composite repairs, with or without silane application. J Conserv Dent. 2018;21(3):263-8.
(26) Brendeke J, Ozcan M. Effect of physicochemical aging conditions on the composite-composite repair bond strength. J Adhes Dent. 2007;9(4):399-406.
(27) Baroudi K, Rodrigues JC. Flowable resin composites: A systematic review and clinical considerations. J Clin Diagnostic Res. 2015;9(6):ZE18-ZE24.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Autores que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:
a) Autores mantém os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons Attribution que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
b) Autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
c) Autores têm permissão e são estimulados a publicar e distribuir seu trabalho online (ex.: em repositórios institucionais ou na sua página pessoal) a qualquer ponto antes ou durante o processo editorial, já que isso pode gerar alterações produtivas, bem como aumentar o impacto e a citação do trabalho publicado (Veja O Efeito do Acesso Livre).
